Finals Thoughts: Loving KG, Re-evaluating Gasol

Last night, watching the Celtics’ 131-92 dismantling of the Lakers and its deliriously entertaining aftermath, I think I was as happy as I’d ever been witnessing a sporting event.

I’ve never been a particularly traditional sports fan. Sure, I have teams that I root for, but in almost all cases, I care more about the sports themselves than individual teams. I don’t live and die by the fates of my teams and I don’t idealize athletes. Not just now, but even as a kid.

But Kevin Garnett is different. Just like Scoop Jackson, I go way back with KG. I was a student at Macalester College in St. Paul, Minnesota, when the Minnesota Timberwolves drafted Garnett, so I’ve watched his career closely from day one.

I saw a scrawny, unknown teenager emerge as a seven-foot basketball ballet dancer, a performer with astounding grace, strength, and fluidity. And I saw him emerge as a magnificently charismatic and magnanimous presence, on-court and off.

I’ve lived in two cities in my life: Minneapolis-St. Paul, where Garnett was the best ever player for the community’s long-suffering NBA franchise and was traded to the Celtics last year; and Memphis, where Pau Gasol was the best ever player for the community’s long-suffering NBA franchise and was traded to the Lakers early this year.

During last night’s game and again today, I’ve gotten calls and texts and e-mails from old Minnesota friends who are now scattered around the country. Every Timberwolves fan I know was rooting for Garnett to win a title — in a Celtics uniform — as if he were a member of their family. And they are overjoyed on his behalf today.

By contrast, most Grizzlies fans I know were either conflicted about Pau Gasol’s title bid with the Lakers or were aggressively rooting for Gasol to be exposed and for his performance to force a rebuttal to the extreme, negative national reaction to the Gasol trade.

I’ve defended Gasol plenty, in print and on the radio, against his most vocal and vituperative local detractors, and I still like and respect the guy, but I think this difference is instructive.

I thought the Celtics were the more talented team. I picked them to win the East when the season started, to win the title when the playoffs started, and to take the Lakers in six on the eve of the Finals. But, watching that series, talent wasn’t the key difference: It was heart, chemistry, and mental and physical toughness.

Garnett has his flaws, which were also exposed in the series, but he is a leader, not only beloved by fans from ’Sota and Boston, but by his own teammates. The Celtics loved each other and played with cohesion and passion.

The Lakers, by contrast, were led by Kobe Bryant, an unlikable presence and poor teammate. Their second-banana, Gasol, is a nice guy and admirable person in many ways, but he’s no leader. He’s never inspired the respect and dedication of his teammates.

A rationalist in all things, I tend to focus on the tangible — what players can and can’t do. But this series makes me think that I put too little emphasis on those less tangible qualities equally important to forging a winning player or team. I tend to distrust proclamations about players’ on-court character because such things are difficult to judge and easy to exaggerate.

But the reasons Minnesota fans adore Kevin Garnett even as he wins a title in another city are essentially the same as the reasons Memphis fans never really embraced Gasol even in a Grizzlies’ uniform. I always thought Gasol got too much flack from certain segments of the Grizzlies fan base — I still do. But there are qualities Garnett has that Gasol lacks that have nothing to do with basketball skill. And those qualities are the reason Garnett inspires fans and teammates and Gasol doesn’t.

Now, about the trade: This morning, at a rather negligible draft workout, someone mentioned to Grizzlies GM Chris Wallace that the Lakers were going to be on the hook for $45 million for Gasol over the next three seasons.

Wallace smiled slightly and offered a swift correction: “48.”

I still wouldn’t say this was a bad deal for the Lakers: They did make the Finals. And, as the second-highest revenue team in the league, they can afford to pay nearly $50 million over three years to someone best suited to be a third-best player on a title team. The Grizzlies couldn’t afford to do that and still be successful — most teams couldn’t.

I was never a fan of the Gasol trade, but as someone who’d watched Gasol up close for years and thought intensely about the team’s long-range planning, I understood it. I thought it was rational. Most commentators nationally — who had never watched Gasol play closely and never thought much about the details of team-building from a Memphis perspective — couldn’t be bothered to try to understand it.

Now that these people have had their assumptions about Gasol confronted by the reality of Gasol, that deal will continue to be re-evaluated. I’m happy about that, even if I harbor no ill will towards Pau.

Today, I’m no hater. It’s a happy day for me and everyone I know who has grown to love and admire Kevin Garnett for the past decade-plus. We’re certified. WE MADE IT, MA. TOP OF THE WORLD!

Submitted by Chris Herrington on Wed, 06/18/2008 - 9:46pm.
Chris Herrington's blog | add new comment | email this blog

While your post is accurate about Pow's lack of heart on the court and his understandable lack of respect from Memphis fans for being so weak, you do not address the major problem with the trade--the inequity of the deal! That is why Memphis is perceived as a joke by anyone who has any knowledge of the NBA and its business side.

Who trades a top 3 lottery pick all-star for equivalent of 4 2nd round draft choices? Survey says: Chris Wallace (but, really, we know it was Mr. Memphis Mike Heisley). No one will ever be able to justify this trade on its merits.

I'm glad Pow is gone. At worst, Memphis should have received, at least, a top 10 draft pick for him. Or dumped Cardinals' salary. Or gotten a large percentage of Buss' playoff profits.

(The final series alone, the Lakers took in well over $5 million in ticket sales/merch for 3 games in L.A., I would estimate, so the expense of having Pow in L.A. is easily justified by them making the playoffs. He made L.A. plenty more money than his salary this year and enhanced the overall value of the franchise by at least $10 million this year by ensuring they made the playoffs and got to the finals, which they obviously would not have done without him. His salary is easily absorbed and paid in L.A. In fact, I would say in L.A., he is underpaid!)

This pathetic trade is why Wallace has to get something akin to Beasley out of the draft and Love/Lopez ain't gonna cut it, no matter how many times soul man Vernon plays the O'Jays. The fans have been burned by bad decisions by ownership (biggest one being not selling the team for a realistic price!), and if Beasley comes, that will help make up for serious screw-ups by a billionaire with more dollars than sense.

sherman (not verified) | Fri, 06/20/2008 - 12:18am

Well, I will say that I've come to this opinion reluctantly. I've been labeled an "aPaulogist" and "president of the Pau Gasol fan club" by his local detractors over the years.

I also make this assertion from a standpoint pretty close to the team and not just from the stands. During the Hubie era, the resentment of players like Jason Williams, Bonzi Wells, and James Posey towards Pau's contract and status on the team was one of the reasons that team fell apart. Of course, it was easy then -- and accurate, I'd say -- to lay that blame players (other than Posey) who had been problem personalities at other stops.

But, I've also heard from team sources that the young players on the current squad didn't have the kind of rapport with or respect for Gasol that you'd want if he's supposed to lead the team. Mike Miller generated more locker-room respect. And I think this was one of the reasons for the trade -- a minor reason, perhaps, but one nonetheless.

In Los Angeles, Gasol's not being asked to lead the team. It's not HIS team. He's just a very talented cog. I think that fits his personality better.

Chris Herrington | Thu, 06/19/2008 - 12:57pm

"And those qualities are the reason Garnett inspires fans and teammates and Gasol doesn’t".-

I think you're a little bit biased, forgetting that a lot Grizz fans and "some" teammates (i.e. Battier) loved Pau and were frustrated about the deal. You're only thinking like a local Memphis? fan. I bet you ask other fans and teammates about Pau and what will you find out, choose: Lakers, Spanish National Team, Barcelona...

I can understand you're happy rooting for the Celtics, but happy because Pau couldn't get his Champs' Ring... Quite sad and negative way of thinking/living. I suggest you re-think it over!

Zippo (not verified) | Thu, 06/19/2008 - 5:37am

Nope. I like Free Darko, but I tend to forget to look over there much.

I've never commented there.

Chris Herrington | Thu, 06/19/2008 - 2:38am

Love your stuff. Keep up the nice work. One question - are you a freedarko guy? I have always thought that you might be, but your opening paragraph tonight really makes me think that you are. If so, what's your Comment section handle? I can't get enough of that site. The mark of a great blog is the commenting after the post. On freedarko, it's every bit as good as the post. Freedarko.com is the anti-message board.

Again, keep up the nice work. I konw this ain't an NBA town, but know that you've got a handful of fans from my group that are loyal readers and big NBA guys.

Regards

BShoals is a g-d (not verified) | Thu, 06/19/2008 - 2:33am

Really enjoyed and agreed with (most) of what you wrote. I too understood the reason for the Gasol deal, however, I didn't don't and never will agree that we got enough for him.

To all those that are hooting and hollering that the trade was "vindicated", keep in mind that the Lakers would have likely not made it to the Finals without Pau. Next season with a healthy Bynum, They'll even be better with Gasol floating to the 3rd/4th best player on the roster.

For those that tout the cap space we'll have, all I have to say is "what happened to the cap space Eddie Jones gave us?"

GrizzledGrizzFAn (not verified) | Thu, 06/19/2008 - 2:14am

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Apple Store

Browse archives

« January 2009  
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
        1 3
5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31

Recent comments

Navigation

User login